|
Every month, it seems, a major company stares down the barrel of
Google's brand recognition gun. The company of the month right
now happens to be PayPal. The Wall Street Journal published an
article on Ebay's Jeff Jordan's preparations for Gbuy
(http://online.wsj.com/public/article/
SB113918924045565647-jtBYW5A_4ZI6WZiwUaUJNSbVAQI_20070206.html),
the so called PayPal killer (PayPal is owned by Ebay). Many news
sources and blogs are anticipating Gbuy to quickly become a
PayPal killer given Google's huge brand name recognition and
reach with consumers.
But the whole PayPal killing talk is really much ado about
nothing. I have no doubt whatsoever that Google will release
Gbuy, but I do have significant doubts as to whether it will
actually replace PayPal as many merchant's payment processor of
choice. Given Google's recent releases, and given how PayPal has
positioned itself in the marketplace, I would not be surprised
of Gbuy proves itself to be a significant flop considering all
the attention it has been given.
PayPal's Vulnerability
Jeff Jordan of Ebay has every right to be scared, however.
Executives have a history of losing their dignity and control
when they feel pressured by Google. Steve Ballmer is well known
for his professional wrestling-like tirade in which he sent
chairs flying and cursed the name of Google, and Yahoo is not
much better having publicly given up its quest for search
dominance (http://www.site-reference.com/articles/Search-Engines/
Following-Yahoo-to-a-Wealth-of-Traffic.html), which in effect
was Yahoo executives crying ?Uncle!? with the hope that they
could finally focus on something that they could actually excel
in.
Professional wrestling rant's aside, Jeff Jordan does have
reason to be worried. PayPal, unlike Yahoo and Microsoft, is
much more vulnerable to a direct attack from Google. The history
of PayPal is filled with trouble with CEO's, run-ins with the
mafia, and pressure from an Attorney General. This article,
however, is not the place for a lesson on the history of PayPal
(a book was written for that (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/
redirect?link_code=ur2&tag=coffeenbooks-20&camp=1789&creative=9325
&path=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fproduct%2F0974670103%
2Fsr%3D1-2%2Fqid%3D1139322921%2Fref%3Dsr_1_2%3F%255Fencoding%3DUTF8) ),
regardless of how fascinating it might be.
Article Tip
Did you know that PayPal is one of the few companies with a
single letter domain name? Check it out: X.com (http://x.com/)
The problem with PayPal is that it has not solidified itself in
any other market besides the payment option of eBay merchants.
The result is that many website owners view PayPal as a 'cheap'
option. Furthermore, even though PayPal does allow non-members
to purchase items through their system, it is not as easy as
many merchant's would like. Many of the problems of PayPal were
actually discussed on the forums
(http://forums.site-reference.com/topic/496/Who-Uses-Paypal/)
a while ago.
These problems open up a vulnerability for PayPal. If Google
releases a product that improves on the downfalls of PayPal in
much the same way that they were able to revolutionize online
maps, then PayPal should be worried. Google does have a knack
for making web applications that make existing applications look
outdated and simplistic.
Why Gbuy Will Not Kill PayPal
Experts have been predicting the wild success of Google in many
different industries for some time. When Froogle was released it
was thought by many to be a major threat to Amazon.com. Although
Gmail has been a success, there have been no reports of Yahoo
Mail suffering significant attrition (in fact the buzz over the
new Yahoo Mail (http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/005401.html)
interface shows just how much interest there is in Yahoo Mail).
And although Google News is a highly useful service, it is
hardly considered the default news service for most web users.
The fact is, the past few Google releases have been relative
failures. Google admitted that they screwed up
(http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/257040_googlestore26.html)
with their video service (the Apple iPod Video is much more
successful and sets the bar much higher than Google is currently
meeting). Google Reader was met with a collective 'ho-hum' from
the webmaster community (as was Google Pack), and even though
Google Sitemaps may be useful, it is still under used. Google
Analytics still is not able to accommodate mass signups, and the
buzz over analytics has also declined significantly since its
release.
Really, if we were to look at Google's recent releases, the only
relatively successful releases have been Google's Search
(obviously), Adwords and Adsense (also obvious), Google Maps,
and Gmail. The fact is, with the exception of Adwords and
Adsense, Google has not been very successful in launching
commercial products.
Google's Lack of Simplicity for 'Everyday' Users
The problem with most of Google's recent releases has been its
lack of simplicity. Google's initial success in search was
powered by the extreme simplicity they brought to the process.
All the user saw was a search box and search results. What could
be more simple? On top of that, search results were stunningly
accurate compared to the other results available.
Although Adwords is confusing to many website owners, Adsense
also carries the trait of being extraordinarily simple. Add in
the benefit of being able to make a significant income from
Adsense and it is no wonder that Google has a firm hold on the
contextual ad market. For potential advertisers there is no
greater reach than Google Adwords.
Yet most of Google's recent releases have either lacked the
simplicity that made them the choice for every day users or
offer no significant advantages over existing products. If
PayPal is genuinely going to be threated by Gbuy, then Google is
going to have to perfect the simplicity that PayPal has
capitalized on.
Gbuy - Finding a Niche Among Website Owners
A few years back when K-Mart filed for bankruptcy, I remember
listening to an analysis which looked at the reasons why K-Mart
was having difficulty. The analyst explained how there were
three major players in the mega-stores: Wal-Mart, K-Mart, and
Target. Wal-Mart had successfully positioned itself as the
price-leader out of the three mega-stores while Target, although
still inexpensive, positioned itself as slightly more expensive,
but higher quality. K-Mart, in this environment, lacked an
identity to shoppers.
Gbuy could very well fall into the same problem. PayPal has done
a great job in solidifying itself as the payment solution of
choice for millions of Ebay merchants. In addition, thousands of
other website owners have chosen to at least add PayPal as a
payment option on their website due to its extreme simplicity
for those who have PayPal accounts.
In a best case scenario Gbuy could really only hope to fit in as
an alternate payment system to those who have already
established how users are supposed to pay for their goods. In
all reality, though, the market is crowded, and Ebay users will
likely continue to use the integrated, easy to use PayPal over
any new-commer - especially of Google fails to make a relatively
simple product. Every month, it seems, a major company stares down the barrel of
Google's brand recognition gun. The company of the month right
now happens to be PayPal. The Wall Street Journal published an
article on Ebay's Jeff Jordan's preparations for Gbuy
(http://online.wsj.com/public/article/
SB113918924045565647-jtBYW5A_4ZI6WZiwUaUJNSbVAQI_20070206.html),
the so called PayPal killer (PayPal is owned by Ebay). Many news
sources and blogs are anticipating Gbuy to quickly become a
PayPal killer given Google's huge brand name recognition and
reach with consumers. But the whole PayPal killing talk is really much ado about
nothing. I have no doubt whatsoever that Google will release
Gbuy, but I do have significant doubts as to whether it will
actually replace PayPal as many merchant's payment processor of
choice. Given Google's recent releases, and given how PayPal has
positioned itself in the marketplace, I would not be surprised
of Gbuy proves itself to be a significant flop considering all
the attention it has been given. PayPal's Vulnerability Jeff Jordan of Ebay has every right to be scared, however.
Executives have a history of losing their dignity and control
when they feel pressured by Google. Steve Ballmer is well known
for his professional wrestling-like tirade in which he sent
chairs flying and cursed the name of Google, and Yahoo is not
much better having publicly given up its quest for search
dominance (http://www.site-reference.com/articles/Search-Engines/
Following-Yahoo-to-a-Wealth-of-Traffic.html), which in effect
was Yahoo executives crying ?Uncle!? with the hope that they
could finally focus on something that they could actually excel
in.
Professional wrestling rant's aside, Jeff Jordan does have
reason to be worried. PayPal, unlike Yahoo and Microsoft, is
much more vulnerable to a direct attack from Google. The history
of PayPal is filled with trouble with CEO's, run-ins with the
mafia, and pressure from an Attorney General. This article,
however, is not the place for a lesson on the history of PayPal
(a book was written for that (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/
redirect?link_code=ur2&tag=coffeenbooks-20&camp=1789&creative=9325
&path=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fproduct%2F0974670103%
2Fsr%3D1-2%2Fqid%3D1139322921%2Fref%3Dsr_1_2%3F%255Fencoding%3DUTF8) ),
regardless of how fascinating it might be. Article Tip
Did you know that PayPal is one of the few companies with a
single letter domain name? Check it out: X.com (http://x.com/)
The problem with PayPal is that it has not solidified itself in
any other market besides the payment option of eBay merchants.
The result is that many website owners view PayPal as a 'cheap'
option. Furthermore, even though PayPal does allow non-members
to purchase items through their system, it is not as easy as
many merchant's would like. Many of the problems of PayPal were
actually discussed on the forums
(http://forums.site-reference.com/topic/496/Who-Uses-Paypal/)
a while ago. These problems open up a vulnerability for PayPal. If Google
releases a product that improves on the downfalls of PayPal in
much the same way that they were able to revolutionize online
maps, then PayPal should be worried. Google does have a knack
for making web applications that make existing applications look
outdated and simplistic. Why Gbuy Will Not Kill PayPal Experts have been predicting the wild success of Google in many
different industries for some time. When Froogle was released it
was thought by many to be a major threat to Amazon.com. Although
Gmail has been a success, there have been no reports of Yahoo
Mail suffering significant attrition (in fact the buzz over the
new Yahoo Mail (http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/005401.html)
interface shows just how much interest there is in Yahoo Mail).
And although Google News is a highly useful service, it is
hardly considered the default news service for most web users. The fact is, the past few Google releases have been relative
failures. Google admitted that they screwed up
(http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/257040_googlestore26.html)
with their video service (the Apple iPod Video is much more
successful and sets the bar much higher than Google is currently
meeting). Google Reader was met with a collective 'ho-hum' from
the webmaster community (as was Google Pack), and even though
Google Sitemaps may be useful, it is still under used. Google
Analytics still is not able to accommodate mass signups, and the
buzz over analytics has also declined significantly since its
release. Really, if we were to look at Google's recent releases, the only
relatively successful releases have been Google's Search
(obviously), Adwords and Adsense (also obvious), Google Maps,
and Gmail. The fact is, with the exception of Adwords and
Adsense, Google has not been very successful in launching
commercial products. Google's Lack of Simplicity for 'Everyday' Users The problem with most of Google's recent releases has been its
lack of simplicity. Google's initial success in search was
powered by the extreme simplicity they brought to the process.
All the user saw was a search box and search results. What could
be more simple? On top of that, search results were stunningly
accurate compared to the other results available. Although Adwords is confusing to many website owners, Adsense
also carries the trait of being extraordinarily simple. Add in
the benefit of being able to make a significant income from
Adsense and it is no wonder that Google has a firm hold on the
contextual ad market. For potential advertisers there is no
greater reach than Google Adwords. Yet most of Google's recent releases have either lacked the
simplicity that made them the choice for every day users or
offer no significant advantages over existing products. If
PayPal is genuinely going to be threated by Gbuy, then Google is
going to have to perfect the simplicity that PayPal has
capitalized on. Gbuy - Finding a Niche Among Website Owners A few years back when K-Mart filed for bankruptcy, I remember
listening to an analysis which looked at the reasons why K-Mart
was having difficulty. The analyst explained how there were
three major players in the mega-stores: Wal-Mart, K-Mart, and
Target. Wal-Mart had successfully positioned itself as the
price-leader out of the three mega-stores while Target, although
still inexpensive, positioned itself as slightly more expensive,
but higher quality. K-Mart, in this environment, lacked an
identity to shoppers. Gbuy could very well fall into the same problem. PayPal has done
a great job in solidifying itself as the payment solution of
choice for millions of Ebay merchants. In addition, thousands of
other website owners have chosen to at least add PayPal as a
payment option on their website due to its extreme simplicity
for those who have PayPal accounts. In a best case scenario Gbuy could really only hope to fit in as
an alternate payment system to those who have already
established how users are supposed to pay for their goods. In
all reality, though, the market is crowded, and Ebay users will
likely continue to use the integrated, easy to use PayPal over
any new-commer - especially of Google fails to make a relatively
simple product.
Mark Daoust is the owner of Site Reference
(http://www.site-reference.com). If you want to reference this
article, please reference it at its original published location:
(http://www.site-reference.com/articles/General/
Gbuy-What-Every-Website-Owner-Must-Know.html)
|